The ginormous Smithsonian Witness Elm tree along Constitution Avenue near 9th Street NW,
Washington, D.C., 7:09 p.m. Aug 2, 2019
Washington, D.C., 7:09 p.m. Aug 2, 2019
This tree is said to have been planted circa 1850 -- making it about 170 years old (see here).
I took the pictures in this entry on Friday evening walking from work at L'Enfant Plaza back up to my neighborhood to Annie's, where I met Fred upstairs. This included a detour to the dark, cool bar at Maestro where I had a lovely summer drink and an amazing shrimp cocktail while listening to a performing duo -- singer and piano player.
I'm not captioning the pictures (except for the lead one), so if you're curious, just click on them and download them since the file names contain the time and place information.
Must repost in full …
Marianne Williamson Knows How to Beat Trump
We need an uprising of decency.
By David Brooks
The New York Times
August 1, 2019
If only …
If only Donald Trump were not president, we could have an interesting debate over whether private health insurance should be illegal. If only Trump were not president, we could have an interesting debate over who was softest on crime in the 1990s. If only Trump were not president, we could have a nice argument about the pros and cons of NAFTA.
But Trump is president, and this election is not about those things. This election is about who we are as a people, our national character. This election is about the moral atmosphere in which we raise our children.
Trump is a cultural revolutionary, not a policy revolutionary. He operates and is subtly changing America at a much deeper level. He’s operating at the level of dominance and submission, at the level of the person where fear stalks and contempt emerges.
He's redefining what you can say and how a leader can act. He’s reasserting an old version of what sort of masculinity deserves to be followed and obeyed. In Freudian terms, he's operating on the level of the id. In Thomistic terms, he is instigating a degradation of America's soul.
We are all subtly corrupted while this guy is our leader. And throughout this campaign he will make himself and his values the center of conversation. Every day he will stage a little drama that is meant to redefine who we are, what values we lift up and who we hate.
The Democrats have not risen to the largeness of this moment. They don't know how to speak on this level. They don't even have the language to articulate what Trump represents and what needs to be done.
Part of the problem is that the two leading Democratic idea generators are both materialistic wonks. Elizabeth Warren is a social scientist from Harvard Law School who has a plan for everything — except the central subject of this election, which is cultural and moral. Bernie Sanders has been a dialectical materialist all his life and is incapable of adjusting his economics-dominated mind-set.
They are what Michael Dukakis would be if he emerged in an era when the party had swung left. This model has always had appeal to a certain sort of well-educated Democrat.
The bigger problem is simply the culture of the Democratic Party. The modern version of the party emerged during the Great Depression to solve one problem: material want. It is a secular party, trapped in a Lockean prison: Politics should be separate from faith. Politics should be separate from soulcraft. Democrats believe they can win votes by offering members of different groups economic benefits and are perpetually shocked when they lose those voters.
It is no accident that the Democratic candidate with the best grasp of this election is the one running a spiritual crusade, not an economic redistribution effort. Many of her ideas are wackadoodle, but Marianne Williamson is right about this: "This is part of the dark underbelly of American society: the racism, the bigotry and the entire conversation that we're having here tonight. If you think any of this wonkiness is going to deal with this dark psychic force of the collectivized hatred that this president is bringing up in this country, then I'm afraid that the Democrats are going to see some very dark days."
And she is right about this: "We've never dealt with a figure like this in American history before. This man, our president, is not just a politician; he's a phenomenon. And an insider political game will not be able to defeat it. … The only thing that will defeat him is if we have a phenomenon of equal force, and that phenomenon is a moral uprising of the American people."
They are unready for it, but it falls on the Democrats to rebuild the moral infrastructure of our country. That does not mean standing up and saying, "Donald Trump is a racist!" 500 times a day. It means reminding Americans of the values we still share, and the damage done when people are not held accountable for trampling on them. The values are pretty basic and can be simply expressed:
Unity: We're one people. Our leader represents all the people. He doesn't go around attacking whole cities and regions.
Honesty: We can't have deliberative democracy without respect for the truth. None of us want congenital liars in our homes or our workplaces.
Pluralism: Human difference makes life richer and more interesting. We treasure members of all races and faiths for what they bring to the mosaic.
Sympathy: We want to be around people with good hearts, who feel for those who are suffering, who are faithful friends, whose daily lives are marked by kindness.
Opportunity: We want all children to have an open field and a fair chance in the great race of life.
Trump has put himself on the wrong side of all these values. So Democrats, go ahead and promote your plans. But also lead an uprising of decency. There must be one Democrat who, in word and deed, can do that.
A version of this article appears in print on Aug. 2, 2019, Section A, Page 27 of the New York edition with the headline: Listen to Marianne Williamson. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe
By the way, Bill Maher interviewed Marianne Williamson on his most recent Real Time show. Here is that interview:
Bill Maher likes her and I like her, the nuttiness part notwithstanding. She's spot on right in her analysis of Trump and what it will take to defeat him.
And even that assumes, problematically, no Russian government election-focused cyber-warfare to disrupt the vast, sprawling, easy-to-screw-with, hyper-localized American voting system which, anyway, something that Moscow Mitch really wants because he is amoral, nihilistic, power-hungry, sclerotic piece of shit who enables the GOP Cult of Trump.